• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Header Right

Contact Us

Business Advancement

Igniting Momentum for Game-Changing Results

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Overview
    • Pamela S. Harper
    • D. Scott Harper
    • Media
  • Client Results
    • Success Stories
    • Testimonials
  • Speaking
    • For Meeting Planners
  • Services
    • Advisory / Consulting
    • Coaching
      • Individual Coaching For Executives
      • Executive Team Coaching and Retreats
  • Book
  • Free Resources
    • Resources Overview
    • Growth Igniters Radio
    • The Harper Report
    • Special Reports
  • Podcast
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

How Can You Increase the Quality of Decisions In The Digital Age?

Perhaps, like us, you’ve been seeing articles about a highly disruptive innovation that’s celebrating it’s 50th anniversary this year. The ATM is widely considered to be the beginning of the 24/7 service culture that transformed banking and business practices.

This helped usher in the digital age that has transformed world culture, including how we make decisions about all kinds of matters beyond banking.

Today, the collective comfort with machine-human transactions has spilled over to create the increasingly transactional nature of much human-human communication enabled by email, text messaging, Twitter, Slack messaging, and more.

Although digital interaction is often perfect for straightforward information or quick transactions, it’s not the best choice for making decisions that have a strong impact.

While we all know this, the convenience of digital interaction makes it all too easy to inadvertently get caught up in a transactional approach to strategic interactions. Here’s how it can happen, and what to do about it…

Suppose you were part of a series of group texts about a decision that seemed straightforward. Different people are unexpectedly responding at different times with new information.  Now, someone responds  “I didn’t say that.”

Depending upon your point of view, you might easily come up with four different interpretations to this simple sentence and respond in a way that launches more back and forth, confusion, and conflict.

This is more than hypothetical — each of us has seen this dynamic in action. So, what’s the answer?

When the stakes are high, it can actually be faster and more effective to have a real-time interactive conversation.

Sometimes it’s easy to see when meetings are essential for making a critical decision. However, sometimes, it’s not so easy to make that call. The key is knowing when to switch from digital interaction to real-time conversation.

Here’s a rule of thumb we’ve developed over the years: when a string of texts, Slack messages or emails runs past 3 back-and-forth exchanges, it’s time to put away the devices and talk.

Whether it’s actually face-to-face, over the phone, or through video conference, a real-time conversation is far better at building stronger decisions − and the commitment that’s needed to see them through.

Primary Sidebar

Join Our Community
Listen to Growth Igniters Radio

Notable and New

  • Listen to our Fan Favorite Podcast, “A Leader’s Guide to Finding the Positive Side of Turbulence“
  • Listen to our Fan Favorite Podcast, “Live a Life of Meaning – Every Day“
  • Read our Growth Igniters® Post: Visionary Business Leaders Praise Growth Igniters® Radio as We Enter Our 6th Year
  • Article in Chief Executive: Six Ways to Boost the ROI of Your Strategic Alliance

Raise the Bar on your
Company's Performance!

Read Book Reviews
Preventing Strategic Gridlock Get Your Copy Today
Previous:

« How Can You Best Help Small Businesses After the Hurricanes?

Next

Good News For Visionary Leaders Of Companies With Beloved Brands »

Footer

Follow Us

Business Advancement Inc. - Advancing Momentum for Game-Changing Results

Quick Links

  • Advisory
  • Consulting
  • Speaking
  • Executive Coaching
  • Growth Igniters Radio

Contact Us


Contact Today

Privacy & Terms of Use

Copyright © 2021 · Business Advancement Inc.